Bedraggled Daisy

This week we have been charged with the task of examining our research interest in the form of Kristin Luker’s “bedraggled daisy.” As stated in my previous blog post, I am interested in examining the way(s) in which information is mediated/censored in the library. I am aware that I will have to narrow this question eventually, but at this moment in time I don’t have it narrowed except for the fact that I would like to look at the actions of individual librarians/library workers.

I hold intellectual freedom in high regard, but it is an article I read earlier this year concerning a weeding “scandal” at the Urbana Free Library in Urbana Illinois that first got me thinking about the unconscious ways in which information in libraries is mediated. The article, entitled “Do you ever read any of the books you [weed]?” (a play on the line from Fahrenheit 451) examines the background of the scandal rather than actually discussing weeding methodology in depth. But I began about how even libraries with well established (and practiced) weeding policies must fall prey to the biases of the individuals charged with weeding. Not to mention the forces at play when materials are selected and recommended to potential users.

Another case which forced me to think about this issue the 2012 controversy surrounding the banning of Alan Moore’s Neonomicon by a single library director of a South Carolinian library (Gomez, 2012). The content of Moore’s work is controversial and directed at adults, however the decision of one person to remove it from the library affected an entire community.

I have been able to narrow down the overlapping issues in my research topic to the following:

1) Policy- both the policy of libraries and of larger organizations such at the CLA and the ALA.
2) Access to education- Who has the opportunity/inclination to work in a library in a capacity which would give them the power to mediate/gate keep information?
3) Social context(s)- where is the library located? Is the town/neighbourhood conservative, poor, liberal, white, etc?
4) Psychology- Does acknowledging one’s biases necessarily make a difference? Can a person even be aware of all of their biases?




Gomez, B. (December 3, 2012). NEONOMICON Banned in South Carolina.  Retrieved from

Nectoux, T. (June 13, 2013). “Do you ever read any of the books you [weed]?” Retrieved from


Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “Bedraggled Daisy

  1. Hey Portia,

    This might fall under you policy pedal, but what about capacity constraints when it comes to weeding. As more new books are added to the collection, other (usually older) books have to be removed to make space. At my library the criteria for withdrawing a book from the collection is if; there is a duplicate copy, it is old, worn out materials (which may be an indicator that they are in demand, but are just falling apart) and low circulation for the item. If an item is circulates less than 7 times per year from when it was cataloged then it can be withdrawn. Classics, books that are used in the school curriculum and the personal preference of the worker weeding allow for exceptions to be made (I’ve personally made sure that The Time Machine by H.G. Wells as never been pulled.

    I think your topic is very interesting and I know I would like to learn more about the impact of intentional/unintentional censorship through weeding.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s