What Happens If….

Professor Galey stated that too often reviewers tend to try to crowbar the subject of a paper into their own paradigm instead of evaluating the paper for its own merit. If this happens to often, what does the author of the paper do?

In academia, peer review is often used to determine an academic paper’s suitability for publication. If I wrote an article, and several scholars reviewed it, but tore it apart for reasons other than its merit towards the research I was conducting, how do you justify this? 

I don’t recall Professor Galey mentioning this in class. 


Victoria Grant 



Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s